http://john.jubjubs.net/2006/02/05/im-overload/ my semi-regular stream of consciousness Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:21:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://john.jubjubs.net/2006/02/05/im-overload/#comment-59 Tristan Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:40:49 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/?p=222#comment-59 Now that I have your AIM buddy name, you may be my next victim :-) (to chat about BD in EU). Now that I have your AIM buddy name, you may be my next victim (to chat about BD in EU).

]]> http://john.jubjubs.net/2006/02/05/im-overload/#comment-5894 Tristan Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:40:49 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/?p=222#comment-5894 Now that I have your AIM buddy name, you may be my next victim :-) (to chat about BD in EU). Now that I have your AIM buddy name, you may be my next victim (to chat about BD in EU).

]]> http://john.jubjubs.net/2006/02/05/im-overload/#comment-58 Adam Nash Tue, 07 Feb 2006 01:14:00 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/?p=222#comment-58 I've been pushing for the same thing in Skype - some form of buddy list/group prioritization. Some way to be "available" for one group, but not another. I’ve been pushing for the same thing in Skype – some form of buddy list/group prioritization. Some way to be “available” for one group, but not another.

]]> http://john.jubjubs.net/2006/02/05/im-overload/#comment-5893 Adam Nash Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:14:00 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/?p=222#comment-5893 I've been pushing for the same thing in Skype - some form of buddy list/group prioritization. Some way to be "available" for one group, but not another. I’ve been pushing for the same thing in Skype – some form of buddy list/group prioritization. Some way to be “available” for one group, but not another.

]]>