Comments on: leverage http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/ my semi-regular stream of consciousness Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:22:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: muhabbet http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-6650 muhabbet Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:09:50 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-6650 Thank you very much for this useful article and the comments.<br><br>---------------<br>Leonard The Magazine Stundent at 9 Eylul University <a href="http://www.sohbet15.com" title="sohbet" target="_blank">sohbet</a> Thank you very much for this useful article and the comments.

—————
Leonard The Magazine Stundent at 9 Eylul University sohbet

]]> By: John’s Blog » Blog Archive » hearts on sleeves http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-286 John’s Blog » Blog Archive » hearts on sleeves Wed, 16 May 2007 17:38:01 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-286 [...] accusation, retraction, questioning, talking, talking, talking. One of the clear examples of the leverage that I spent a while writing about on Sunday. It’s one of the brilliances of what mozilla.org [...] [...] accusation, retraction, questioning, talking, talking, talking. One of the clear examples of the leverage that I spent a while writing about on Sunday. It’s one of the brilliances of what mozilla.org [...]

]]> By: rebron.org » XULRunner http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-283 rebron.org » XULRunner Wed, 16 May 2007 07:31:28 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-283 [...] have to understand that Mozilla can only work on things that can be *highly* leveraged.  It’s the only way 100 people can support 1000 developers and tens of millions of [...] [...] have to understand that Mozilla can only work on things that can be *highly* leveraged.  It’s the only way 100 people can support 1000 developers and tens of millions of [...]

]]> By: Lori http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-274 Lori Mon, 14 May 2007 13:07:06 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-274 "We do have to make choices, though. There’s only so much time, there’s only so much attention. It’s tough for a small band of folks to change the world, and sometimes you do things in an order you may not like the best." So funny -- it's something we tell our users (and especially our beta testers) over and over again, and I work for one of the Big Moneythrowers mentioned above. :) The Company may be huge, but the development teams are relatively small -- and the releases must be well-defined, manageable, and (above all, when you work for a for-profit organization) shippable. Gah, I could write pages and pages on this subject, but I don't want to hijack your comments. Maybe I'll post about it in my blog, or the new team one, one of these days... “We do have to make choices, though. There’s only so much time, there’s only so much attention. It’s tough for a small band of folks to change the world, and sometimes you do things in an order you may not like the best.” So funny — it’s something we tell our users (and especially our beta testers) over and over again, and I work for one of the Big Moneythrowers mentioned above. :) The Company may be huge, but the development teams are relatively small — and the releases must be well-defined, manageable, and (above all, when you work for a for-profit organization) shippable. Gah, I could write pages and pages on this subject, but I don’t want to hijack your comments. Maybe I’ll post about it in my blog, or the new team one, one of these days…

]]> By: John http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-273 John Mon, 14 May 2007 13:06:23 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-273 Håkan W, you're right, absolutely. I'm being a little loose here, and should be talking about building on top of Gecko instead of XULrunner, but yesterday conflated using the codebase integrated to build other apps with the XULrunner runtime. Håkan W, you’re right, absolutely. I’m being a little loose here, and should be talking about building on top of Gecko instead of XULrunner, but yesterday conflated using the codebase integrated to build other apps with the XULrunner runtime.

]]> By: Lori http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-5246 Lori Mon, 14 May 2007 11:07:06 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-5246 "We do have to make choices, though. There’s only so much time, there’s only so much attention. It’s tough for a small band of folks to change the world, and sometimes you do things in an order you may not like the best." So funny -- it's something we tell our users (and especially our beta testers) over and over again, and I work for one of the Big Moneythrowers mentioned above. :) The Company may be huge, but the development teams are relatively small -- and the releases must be well-defined, manageable, and (above all, when you work for a for-profit organization) shippable. Gah, I could write pages and pages on this subject, but I don't want to hijack your comments. Maybe I'll post about it in my blog, or the new team one, one of these days... “We do have to make choices, though. There’s only so much time, there’s only so much attention. It’s tough for a small band of folks to change the world, and sometimes you do things in an order you may not like the best.” So funny — it’s something we tell our users (and especially our beta testers) over and over again, and I work for one of the Big Moneythrowers mentioned above. :) The Company may be huge, but the development teams are relatively small — and the releases must be well-defined, manageable, and (above all, when you work for a for-profit organization) shippable. Gah, I could write pages and pages on this subject, but I don’t want to hijack your comments. Maybe I’ll post about it in my blog, or the new team one, one of these days…

]]> By: John http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-5245 John Mon, 14 May 2007 11:06:23 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-5245 Håkan W, you're right, absolutely. I'm being a little loose here, and should be talking about building on top of Gecko instead of XULrunner, but yesterday conflated using the codebase integrated to build other apps with the XULrunner runtime. Håkan W, you’re right, absolutely. I’m being a little loose here, and should be talking about building on top of Gecko instead of XULrunner, but yesterday conflated using the codebase integrated to build other apps with the XULrunner runtime.

]]> By: Tristan http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-270 Tristan Mon, 14 May 2007 07:49:47 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-270 Great post, John! Great post, John!

]]> By: Håkan W http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-269 Håkan W Mon, 14 May 2007 06:23:52 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-269 Camino is NOT built on top of XULRunner, unless something very fundamentally changed since I last looked at the code. In fact, many of the problems we've had arise from the fact that it has lots of dependencies inside core Gecko that are thought to be private interfaces. Camino is NOT built on top of XULRunner, unless something very fundamentally changed since I last looked at the code.

In fact, many of the problems we’ve had arise from the fact that it has lots of dependencies inside core Gecko that are thought to be private interfaces.

]]> By: Tristan http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-5244 Tristan Mon, 14 May 2007 05:49:47 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-5244 Great post, John! Great post, John!

]]> By: Håkan W http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-5243 Håkan W Mon, 14 May 2007 04:23:52 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/13/leverage/#comment-5243 Camino is NOT built on top of XULRunner, unless something very fundamentally changed since I last looked at the code. <br><br>In fact, many of the problems we've had arise from the fact that it has lots of dependencies inside core Gecko that are thought to be private interfaces. Camino is NOT built on top of XULRunner, unless something very fundamentally changed since I last looked at the code.

In fact, many of the problems we’ve had arise from the fact that it has lots of dependencies inside core Gecko that are thought to be private interfaces.

]]>