<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eudora &#038; Penelope</title>
	<atom:link href="http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/</link>
	<description>my semi-regular stream of consciousness</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Straub</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-6649</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Straub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-6649</guid>
		<description>I have been a long time Eudora user.  I like it and works very well for me. I&#39;m now getting junk mail you can&#39;t belive.  The sponsered mode doesn&#39;t support filters and am wondering if the paid mode does a good job on filtering junk mail.  I use the Internet for business and can&#39;t easily change email addresses as I have business cards out all over the country.  Any suggestions would be appreciated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been a long time Eudora user.  I like it and works very well for me. I&#39;m now getting junk mail you can&#39;t belive.  The sponsered mode doesn&#39;t support filters and am wondering if the paid mode does a good job on filtering junk mail.  I use the Internet for business and can&#39;t easily change email addresses as I have business cards out all over the country.  Any suggestions would be appreciated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-4469</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 08:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-4469</guid>
		<description>i couldn't find a date on this page. is it january 2005 or july 2002 or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i couldn&#8217;t find a date on this page. is it january 2005 or july 2002 or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5211</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 06:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5211</guid>
		<description>i couldn't find a date on this page. is it january 2005 or july 2002 or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i couldn&#8217;t find a date on this page. is it january 2005 or july 2002 or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madrigal</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>Madrigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Madrigal...&lt;/strong&gt;

news...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Madrigal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>news&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madrigal</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5210</link>
		<dc:creator>Madrigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5210</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Madrigal...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;news...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Madrigal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>news&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quentin</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>Quentin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 04:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>Charles,

Why do you dislike the new MDI option?

Just discovered that text of incoming mails is not editable. Ouch, I liked this, too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,</p>
<p>Why do you dislike the new MDI option?</p>
<p>Just discovered that text of incoming mails is not editable. Ouch, I liked this, too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quentin</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5209</link>
		<dc:creator>Quentin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 02:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5209</guid>
		<description>Charles,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why do you dislike the new MDI option?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just discovered that text of incoming mails is not editable. Ouch, I liked this, too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,</p>
<p>Why do you dislike the new MDI option?</p>
<p>Just discovered that text of incoming mails is not editable. Ouch, I liked this, too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Kanavle</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Kanavle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 16:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-889</guid>
		<description>Eudora has been my mainstay email client for ever, so much so that I cannot see why anyone would want the standard 3-pane window. Having a MDI (multiple document interface) is where its at, and I fear any mix with the other clients may dilute my experience somewhat. One feature I especially like is the ability to edit my received emails. Emails are so often littered with junk or formatting issues, and I do want to save the item in my wonderful mailbox system. Editing the email down to its essential content is something I do ALL the time. They then end up as MY documents. I have been wanting to sound off about this for a while now... thank you for the chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eudora has been my mainstay email client for ever, so much so that I cannot see why anyone would want the standard 3-pane window. Having a MDI (multiple document interface) is where its at, and I fear any mix with the other clients may dilute my experience somewhat. One feature I especially like is the ability to edit my received emails. Emails are so often littered with junk or formatting issues, and I do want to save the item in my wonderful mailbox system. Editing the email down to its essential content is something I do ALL the time. They then end up as MY documents. I have been wanting to sound off about this for a while now&#8230; thank you for the chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Kanavle</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5208</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Kanavle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 14:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5208</guid>
		<description>Eudora has been my mainstay email client for ever, so much so that I cannot see why anyone would want the standard 3-pane window. Having a MDI (multiple document interface) is where its at, and I fear any mix with the other clients may dilute my experience somewhat. One feature I especially like is the ability to edit my received emails. Emails are so often littered with junk or formatting issues, and I do want to save the item in my wonderful mailbox system. Editing the email down to its essential content is something I do ALL the time. They then end up as MY documents. I have been wanting to sound off about this for a while now... thank you for the chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eudora has been my mainstay email client for ever, so much so that I cannot see why anyone would want the standard 3-pane window. Having a MDI (multiple document interface) is where its at, and I fear any mix with the other clients may dilute my experience somewhat. One feature I especially like is the ability to edit my received emails. Emails are so often littered with junk or formatting issues, and I do want to save the item in my wonderful mailbox system. Editing the email down to its essential content is something I do ALL the time. They then end up as MY documents. I have been wanting to sound off about this for a while now&#8230; thank you for the chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Be:Fox &#187; Eudora sous la houlette de Mozilla</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Be:Fox &#187; Eudora sous la houlette de Mozilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 19:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-872</guid>
		<description>[...] pas à proprement parler issu du développement de Mozilla. Si on s&#8217;en réfère à John Lilly, ce qu&#8217;on a aujourd&#8217;hui sous les yeux est le résultat du « travail de l&#8217;équipe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pas à proprement parler issu du développement de Mozilla. Si on s&#8217;en réfère à John Lilly, ce qu&#8217;on a aujourd&#8217;hui sous les yeux est le résultat du « travail de l&#8217;équipe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-867</guid>
		<description>Given TB being spun off, I think merging the two efforts together is the only logical solution. You've even got an organisation (Qualcomm) who would be at the helm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given TB being spun off, I think merging the two efforts together is the only logical solution. You&#8217;ve even got an organisation (Qualcomm) who would be at the helm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5207</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5207</guid>
		<description>Given TB being spun off, I think merging the two efforts together is the only logical solution. You've even got an organisation (Qualcomm) who would be at the helm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given TB being spun off, I think merging the two efforts together is the only logical solution. You&#8217;ve even got an organisation (Qualcomm) who would be at the helm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Flaschen</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Flaschen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 06:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-865</guid>
		<description>Ms. Geek, I have HTML mail turned off in Thunderbird for both sending and viewing.  To view all mail as text-only, click View-Message Body As-Plain Text</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Geek, I have HTML mail turned off in Thunderbird for both sending and viewing.  To view all mail as text-only, click View-Message Body As-Plain Text</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Geek</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 04:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-864</guid>
		<description>Will the Eudora mod for Thunderbird allow for turning off HTML mail completely, just like I could do with Eudora? I currently have been using mail.app for my mail and am fairly happy with it, but I miss Eudora. I even miss the "boo WEE oop!" sound when you got your mail! That shows how far back I go with Eudora.

Last time I used T-Bird I couldn't find the setting to make it default to showing mail as text only. That's why, even though I am a Firefox partisan on the browser side, I stay away from Mozilla products to handle my email. I have no problem with graphics in my browser. And yes, Mac OS X doesn't have the same minefield of hazards with "enhanced" mail as Windows still does. But I still get the willies when I get lots of crap attached to my mail. If you email me I want "just the facts, ma'am" unless I am expecting something attached. Call me a Luddite but that's where I am on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the Eudora mod for Thunderbird allow for turning off HTML mail completely, just like I could do with Eudora? I currently have been using mail.app for my mail and am fairly happy with it, but I miss Eudora. I even miss the &#8220;boo WEE oop!&#8221; sound when you got your mail! That shows how far back I go with Eudora.</p>
<p>Last time I used T-Bird I couldn&#8217;t find the setting to make it default to showing mail as text only. That&#8217;s why, even though I am a Firefox partisan on the browser side, I stay away from Mozilla products to handle my email. I have no problem with graphics in my browser. And yes, Mac OS X doesn&#8217;t have the same minefield of hazards with &#8220;enhanced&#8221; mail as Windows still does. But I still get the willies when I get lots of crap attached to my mail. If you email me I want &#8220;just the facts, ma&#8217;am&#8221; unless I am expecting something attached. Call me a Luddite but that&#8217;s where I am on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Flaschen</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5206</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Flaschen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 04:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5206</guid>
		<description>Ms. Geek, I have HTML mail turned off in Thunderbird for both sending and viewing.  To view all mail as text-only, click View-Message Body As-Plain Text</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Geek, I have HTML mail turned off in Thunderbird for both sending and viewing.  To view all mail as text-only, click View-Message Body As-Plain Text</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Geek</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5205</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5205</guid>
		<description>Will the Eudora mod for Thunderbird allow for turning off HTML mail completely, just like I could do with Eudora? I currently have been using mail.app for my mail and am fairly happy with it, but I miss Eudora. I even miss the "boo WEE oop!" sound when you got your mail! That shows how far back I go with Eudora.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Last time I used T-Bird I couldn't find the setting to make it default to showing mail as text only. That's why, even though I am a Firefox partisan on the browser side, I stay away from Mozilla products to handle my email. I have no problem with graphics in my browser. And yes, Mac OS X doesn't have the same minefield of hazards with "enhanced" mail as Windows still does. But I still get the willies when I get lots of crap attached to my mail. If you email me I want "just the facts, ma'am" unless I am expecting something attached. Call me a Luddite but that's where I am on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the Eudora mod for Thunderbird allow for turning off HTML mail completely, just like I could do with Eudora? I currently have been using mail.app for my mail and am fairly happy with it, but I miss Eudora. I even miss the &#8220;boo WEE oop!&#8221; sound when you got your mail! That shows how far back I go with Eudora.</p>
<p>Last time I used T-Bird I couldn&#8217;t find the setting to make it default to showing mail as text only. That&#8217;s why, even though I am a Firefox partisan on the browser side, I stay away from Mozilla products to handle my email. I have no problem with graphics in my browser. And yes, Mac OS X doesn&#8217;t have the same minefield of hazards with &#8220;enhanced&#8221; mail as Windows still does. But I still get the willies when I get lots of crap attached to my mail. If you email me I want &#8220;just the facts, ma&#8217;am&#8221; unless I am expecting something attached. Call me a Luddite but that&#8217;s where I am on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funTomas</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>funTomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-862</guid>
		<description>I'm curious too. Since the TB's been spun off, hope the E8 will succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious too. Since the TB&#8217;s been spun off, hope the E8 will succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funTomas</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5204</link>
		<dc:creator>funTomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/04/eudora-penelope/#comment-5204</guid>
		<description>I'm curious too. Since the TB's been spun off, hope the E8 will succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious too. Since the TB&#8217;s been spun off, hope the E8 will succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.671 seconds -->
