<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China Road, by Rob Gifford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/22/china-road-by-rob-gifford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/22/china-road-by-rob-gifford/</link>
	<description>my semi-regular stream of consciousness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:03:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Chinese, by Jasper Becker</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/22/china-road-by-rob-gifford/#comment-3965</link>
		<dc:creator>John&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Chinese, by Jasper Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/22/china-road-by-rob-gifford/#comment-3965</guid>
		<description>[...] The Oracle Bones that I think is a better representation of things, not to mention Gifford&#8217;s China Road, which is different in ambition, but excellent.    Previous: &#171; The Watchmen, by Moore &amp; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Oracle Bones that I think is a better representation of things, not to mention Gifford&#8217;s China Road, which is different in ambition, but excellent.    Previous: &laquo; The Watchmen, by Moore &#38; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dijon</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/22/china-road-by-rob-gifford/#comment-2353</link>
		<dc:creator>Dijon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/22/china-road-by-rob-gifford/#comment-2353</guid>
		<description>I agree that Gifford&#039;s book is a very interesting and insightful read; particularly because he has experience pursuing subject matter that is officially &quot;off-limits&quot; and censored by the government. However, I wonder if you were also struck with his view that Chinese basically lack a moral compass. My sense from more than one passage is that he believes this is due to their lack of a monotheistic religious tradition. Personally, I think this judgment seems shallow. It goes without saying that moral righteousness is not synonymous with the presence of a monotheistic religion.

Anyway, rant over. I agree that overall, it&#039;s a very interesting read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Gifford&#8217;s book is a very interesting and insightful read; particularly because he has experience pursuing subject matter that is officially &#8220;off-limits&#8221; and censored by the government. However, I wonder if you were also struck with his view that Chinese basically lack a moral compass. My sense from more than one passage is that he believes this is due to their lack of a monotheistic religious tradition. Personally, I think this judgment seems shallow. It goes without saying that moral righteousness is not synonymous with the presence of a monotheistic religion.</p>
<p>Anyway, rant over. I agree that overall, it&#8217;s a very interesting read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dijon</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/22/china-road-by-rob-gifford/#comment-5842</link>
		<dc:creator>Dijon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/09/22/china-road-by-rob-gifford/#comment-5842</guid>
		<description>I agree that Gifford&#039;s book is a very interesting and insightful read; particularly because he has experience pursuing subject matter that is officially &quot;off-limits&quot; and censored by the government. However, I wonder if you were also struck with his view that Chinese basically lack a moral compass. My sense from more than one passage is that he believes this is due to their lack of a monotheistic religious tradition. Personally, I think this judgment seems shallow. It goes without saying that moral righteousness is not synonymous with the presence of a monotheistic religion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, rant over. I agree that overall, it&#039;s a very interesting read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Gifford&#8217;s book is a very interesting and insightful read; particularly because he has experience pursuing subject matter that is officially &#8220;off-limits&#8221; and censored by the government. However, I wonder if you were also struck with his view that Chinese basically lack a moral compass. My sense from more than one passage is that he believes this is due to their lack of a monotheistic religious tradition. Personally, I think this judgment seems shallow. It goes without saying that moral righteousness is not synonymous with the presence of a monotheistic religion.</p>
<p>Anyway, rant over. I agree that overall, it&#8217;s a very interesting read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
