<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: strike</title>
	<atom:link href="http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/</link>
	<description>my semi-regular stream of consciousness</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Do Writers Get Residuals? (Writers&#8217; Guild of America Strike) &#171; Psychohistory</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Do Writers Get Residuals? (Writers&#8217; Guild of America Strike) &#171; Psychohistory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>[...] November 6th, 2007 &#8212; Adam Nash   This post was inspired by a short, two line snippet in John Lilly&#8217;s blog today.  There has been a lot of press about the current writers&#8217; strike, and it&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] November 6th, 2007 &#8212; Adam Nash   This post was inspired by a short, two line snippet in John Lilly&#8217;s blog today.  There has been a lot of press about the current writers&#8217; strike, and it&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-1441</guid>
		<description>yeah, i don't really know. i think that participation in upside is basically the important key. as i get older, i find myself siding more and more often with "labor" in arguments. in this particular case, as a pure consumer, i enjoy what the writers do more than any other actor in the value chain, so i'd like to see them compensated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i don&#8217;t really know. i think that participation in upside is basically the important key. as i get older, i find myself siding more and more often with &#8220;labor&#8221; in arguments. in this particular case, as a pure consumer, i enjoy what the writers do more than any other actor in the value chain, so i&#8217;d like to see them compensated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Nash</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-1440</guid>
		<description>I'm curious about this quote in particular:

"in other words, not letting them share fairly in the proceeds from the distribution of their work"

I'm having a hard time rationalizing the difference in compensation for writers of media content and software engineers.  Do you think writers would be more fairly paid with salary &#38; stock options, or do you think software engineers should be entitled to residuals on the ongoing sales/profits from the code they write?

Both are situations where creative experts create copyrighted material that is signed over to the corporation based on employment.

I'm having trouble rationalizing the two of them.
Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about this quote in particular:</p>
<p>&#8220;in other words, not letting them share fairly in the proceeds from the distribution of their work&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having a hard time rationalizing the difference in compensation for writers of media content and software engineers.  Do you think writers would be more fairly paid with salary &amp; stock options, or do you think software engineers should be entitled to residuals on the ongoing sales/profits from the code they write?</p>
<p>Both are situations where creative experts create copyrighted material that is signed over to the corporation based on employment.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having trouble rationalizing the two of them.<br />
Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-5643</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-5643</guid>
		<description>yeah, i don't really know. i think that participation in upside is basically the important key. as i get older, i find myself siding more and more often with "labor" in arguments. in this particular case, as a pure consumer, i enjoy what the writers do more than any other actor in the value chain, so i'd like to see them compensated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i don&#8217;t really know. i think that participation in upside is basically the important key. as i get older, i find myself siding more and more often with &#8220;labor&#8221; in arguments. in this particular case, as a pure consumer, i enjoy what the writers do more than any other actor in the value chain, so i&#8217;d like to see them compensated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Nash</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-5642</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-5642</guid>
		<description>I'm curious about this quote in particular:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"in other words, not letting them share fairly in the proceeds from the distribution of their work"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm having a hard time rationalizing the difference in compensation for writers of media content and software engineers.  Do you think writers would be more fairly paid with salary &#38; stock options, or do you think software engineers should be entitled to residuals on the ongoing sales/profits from the code they write?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Both are situations where creative experts create copyrighted material that is signed over to the corporation based on employment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm having trouble rationalizing the two of them.&lt;br&gt;Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about this quote in particular:</p>
<p>&#8220;in other words, not letting them share fairly in the proceeds from the distribution of their work&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having a hard time rationalizing the difference in compensation for writers of media content and software engineers.  Do you think writers would be more fairly paid with salary &amp; stock options, or do you think software engineers should be entitled to residuals on the ongoing sales/profits from the code they write?</p>
<p>Both are situations where creative experts create copyrighted material that is signed over to the corporation based on employment.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having trouble rationalizing the two of them.<br />Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
