<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: strike</title>
	<atom:link href="http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/</link>
	<description>my semi-regular stream of consciousness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:03:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Do Writers Get Residuals? (Writers&#8217; Guild of America Strike) &#171; Psychohistory</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Do Writers Get Residuals? (Writers&#8217; Guild of America Strike) &#171; Psychohistory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>[...] November 6th, 2007 &#8212; Adam Nash   This post was inspired by a short, two line snippet in John Lilly&#8217;s blog today.  There has been a lot of press about the current writers&#8217; strike, and it&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] November 6th, 2007 &#8212; Adam Nash   This post was inspired by a short, two line snippet in John Lilly&#8217;s blog today.  There has been a lot of press about the current writers&#8217; strike, and it&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-1441</guid>
		<description>yeah, i don&#039;t really know. i think that participation in upside is basically the important key. as i get older, i find myself siding more and more often with &quot;labor&quot; in arguments. in this particular case, as a pure consumer, i enjoy what the writers do more than any other actor in the value chain, so i&#039;d like to see them compensated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i don&#8217;t really know. i think that participation in upside is basically the important key. as i get older, i find myself siding more and more often with &#8220;labor&#8221; in arguments. in this particular case, as a pure consumer, i enjoy what the writers do more than any other actor in the value chain, so i&#8217;d like to see them compensated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Nash</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-1440</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about this quote in particular:

&quot;in other words, not letting them share fairly in the proceeds from the distribution of their work&quot;

I&#039;m having a hard time rationalizing the difference in compensation for writers of media content and software engineers.  Do you think writers would be more fairly paid with salary &amp; stock options, or do you think software engineers should be entitled to residuals on the ongoing sales/profits from the code they write?

Both are situations where creative experts create copyrighted material that is signed over to the corporation based on employment.

I&#039;m having trouble rationalizing the two of them.
Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about this quote in particular:</p>
<p>&#8220;in other words, not letting them share fairly in the proceeds from the distribution of their work&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having a hard time rationalizing the difference in compensation for writers of media content and software engineers.  Do you think writers would be more fairly paid with salary &amp; stock options, or do you think software engineers should be entitled to residuals on the ongoing sales/profits from the code they write?</p>
<p>Both are situations where creative experts create copyrighted material that is signed over to the corporation based on employment.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having trouble rationalizing the two of them.<br />
Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-5643</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-5643</guid>
		<description>yeah, i don&#039;t really know. i think that participation in upside is basically the important key. as i get older, i find myself siding more and more often with &quot;labor&quot; in arguments. in this particular case, as a pure consumer, i enjoy what the writers do more than any other actor in the value chain, so i&#039;d like to see them compensated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i don&#8217;t really know. i think that participation in upside is basically the important key. as i get older, i find myself siding more and more often with &#8220;labor&#8221; in arguments. in this particular case, as a pure consumer, i enjoy what the writers do more than any other actor in the value chain, so i&#8217;d like to see them compensated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Nash</title>
		<link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-5642</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/11/05/strike/#comment-5642</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about this quote in particular:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;in other words, not letting them share fairly in the proceeds from the distribution of their work&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m having a hard time rationalizing the difference in compensation for writers of media content and software engineers.  Do you think writers would be more fairly paid with salary &amp; stock options, or do you think software engineers should be entitled to residuals on the ongoing sales/profits from the code they write?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Both are situations where creative experts create copyrighted material that is signed over to the corporation based on employment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m having trouble rationalizing the two of them.&lt;br&gt;Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about this quote in particular:</p>
<p>&#8220;in other words, not letting them share fairly in the proceeds from the distribution of their work&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having a hard time rationalizing the difference in compensation for writers of media content and software engineers.  Do you think writers would be more fairly paid with salary &amp; stock options, or do you think software engineers should be entitled to residuals on the ongoing sales/profits from the code they write?</p>
<p>Both are situations where creative experts create copyrighted material that is signed over to the corporation based on employment.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having trouble rationalizing the two of them.<br />Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
