Comments on: WTFCNN http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/ my semi-regular stream of consciousness Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:21:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: kourtkaj http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-6391 kourtkaj Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:36:53 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-6391 Thanks for sharing <br>best regards<br><br><a href="http://thenewsempire.com/Worlds%20and%20Business/" title="Worlds and Business News">breaking fast news Worlds and Business</a> Thanks for sharing
best regards

breaking fast news Worlds and Business

]]> By: Tao http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-3070 Tao Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:15:05 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-3070 What about Al Jazeera? I find it presents an honest overview for world news. What about Al Jazeera? I find it presents an honest overview for world news.

]]> By: Tao http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5701 Tao Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:15:05 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5701 What about Al Jazeera? I find it presents an honest overview for world news. What about Al Jazeera? I find it presents an honest overview for world news.

]]> By: Robert http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2642 Robert Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:38:17 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2642 IHT is very good...http://www.iht.com/ IHT is very good…http://www.iht.com/

]]> By: Robert http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5700 Robert Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:38:17 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5700 IHT is very good...http://www.iht.com/ IHT is very good…http://www.iht.com/

]]> By: Gary http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2641 Gary Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:37:18 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2641 I was also going to suggest BBC. I guess Topix.com is a little disparate (if that's a word and if I spelled it correctly). But it's interesting to search by zip code and see all the sources and feeds that pop up. Topix.com's user comments quickly devolve into flame wars, though. Best avoided. I was also going to suggest BBC. I guess Topix.com is a little disparate (if that’s a word and if I spelled it correctly). But it’s interesting to search by zip code and see all the sources and feeds that pop up.

Topix.com’s user comments quickly devolve into flame wars, though. Best avoided.

]]> By: Gary http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5699 Gary Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:37:18 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5699 I was also going to suggest BBC. I guess <a href="http://Topix.com">Topix.com</a> is a little disparate (if that's a word and if I spelled it correctly). But it's interesting to search by zip code and see all the sources and feeds that pop up.<br><br>Topix.com's user comments quickly devolve into flame wars, though. Best avoided. I was also going to suggest BBC. I guess Topix.com is a little disparate (if that’s a word and if I spelled it correctly). But it’s interesting to search by zip code and see all the sources and feeds that pop up.

Topix.com’s user comments quickly devolve into flame wars, though. Best avoided.

]]> By: Sam http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2635 Sam Tue, 18 Mar 2008 03:59:42 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2635 Surprisingly, I've been impressed with MSNBC lately. Their clean website helps, but the articles are well written as well and the occasional video is nice too. I'd highly recommend it and that's not something I would've said a year ago. Surprisingly, I’ve been impressed with MSNBC lately. Their clean website helps, but the articles are well written as well and the occasional video is nice too. I’d highly recommend it and that’s not something I would’ve said a year ago.

]]> By: John http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2634 John Tue, 18 Mar 2008 03:29:34 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2634 but doesn't it seem strange that there aren't really good answers here? but doesn’t it seem strange that there aren’t really good answers here?

]]> By: John http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2633 John Tue, 18 Mar 2008 03:29:03 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2633 NYT is good, and something i track, but not so good with pop culture or sports or tech, really. i'm sorta lowbrow in my pop culture -- maybe i should just start checking ew.com. NYT is good, and something i track, but not so good with pop culture or sports or tech, really. i’m sorta lowbrow in my pop culture — maybe i should just start checking ew.com.

]]> By: npr http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2627 npr Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:13:08 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2627 why not nytimes? seems so obvious that you must have a reason... why not nytimes?

seems so obvious that you must have a reason…

]]> By: Sam http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5698 Sam Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:59:42 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5698 Surprisingly, I've been impressed with MSNBC lately. Their clean website helps, but the articles are well written as well and the occasional video is nice too. I'd highly recommend it and that's not something I would've said a year ago. Surprisingly, I’ve been impressed with MSNBC lately. Their clean website helps, but the articles are well written as well and the occasional video is nice too. I’d highly recommend it and that’s not something I would’ve said a year ago.

]]> By: John http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5697 John Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:29:34 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5697 but doesn't it seem strange that there aren't really good answers here? but doesn’t it seem strange that there aren’t really good answers here?

]]> By: John http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5696 John Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:29:03 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5696 NYT is good, and something i track, but not so good with pop culture or sports or tech, really. i'm sorta lowbrow in my pop culture -- maybe i should just start checking <a href="http://ew.com">ew.com</a>. NYT is good, and something i track, but not so good with pop culture or sports or tech, really. i’m sorta lowbrow in my pop culture — maybe i should just start checking ew.com.

]]> By: npr http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5695 npr Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:13:08 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5695 why not nytimes? <br><br>seems so obvious that you must have a reason... why not nytimes?

seems so obvious that you must have a reason…

]]> By: gen http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2626 gen Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:56:50 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2626 I find it best to go to Europe for my news on the US. BBC & FT, FTW. I also read my home town rag, the NYT. I find it best to go to Europe for my news on the US. BBC & FT, FTW.

I also read my home town rag, the NYT.

]]> By: gen http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5694 gen Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:56:50 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5694 I find it best to go to Europe for my news on the US. BBC & FT, FTW.<br><br>I also read my home town rag, the NYT. I find it best to go to Europe for my news on the US. BBC & FT, FTW.

I also read my home town rag, the NYT.

]]> By: pkim http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2625 pkim Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:35:03 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2625 http://whitesoap.com/ http://whitesoap.com/

]]> By: pkim http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5693 pkim Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:35:03 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-5693 <a href="http://whitesoap.com/">http://whitesoap.com/</a> http://whitesoap.com/

]]> By: lilly http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2623 lilly Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:43:12 +0000 http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-2623 I first lost faith in CNN during their non-stop coverage of the Jon Benet Ramsey case 8ish years ago. Lewinski fest didn't help either. Back then, I thanked the stars for Google News. Now Goog News is also old somehow... I first lost faith in CNN during their non-stop coverage of the Jon Benet Ramsey case 8ish years ago. Lewinski fest didn’t help either. Back then, I thanked the stars for Google News. Now Goog News is also old somehow…

]]>