Eh, it’s an okay book. Not wonderful. Doesn’t know whether it’s a history of probability or a primer on it, and as a result tends to shift between being (1) sorta basic, (2) sorta boring, and (3) sorta esoteric. Nothing super new in it for me, didn’t really think it was useful, except to remind me of some things I’ve forgotten since Stats 116.
Rush
Aug 30, 16:10 › Craig: Triumph!!! and..... Aug 20, 16:27 › l.m.orchard: +1 to everything you wrote here, including the bits Aug 16, 12:50 › dria: King Crimson is probably more musically/technically Aug 16, 5:32 › Al Jigen Billings: I feel the same way about Trent Reznor and Nine Inch