Personal stuff


26
Jan 10

Flaky

I’ve been very flaky over the last month — hard to schedule, rescheduling meetings & lunches at the last minute, etc. There are reasons for it, but to anyone who I’ve flaked on, I really apologize.

[My Mom's health has needed some attention during the period, but I've also had an incredibly hard time kicking a cold and/or flu -- I'll feel good for a day or two, then have a fever and huge congestion for a day or two, very unpredictably. Kathy and SPL are seeing similar sorts of patterns with their own things.]

Anyway, I hate to be so unpredictable, so I’m really sorry if I’ve flaked on you lately — thanks for understanding.


17
Jan 10

Zeo Followup

A few weeks ago, I blogged about why I returned my Zeo sleep tracker — I liked it, but didn’t trust the data as much as I wanted to. A few days after I posted, I was contacted by Derek Haswell, who manages a bunch of their social media efforts — he had noticed my tweets and blog, and sent me a note to see if I’d be willing to chat with him and their VP of Scientific Affairs, John Shambroom. My initial experience with the Zeo notwithstanding, I’m a huge fan of the company, and am up for helping anyone who’s trying to help us all understand sleep a little bit better. So I spent a half hour or so on the phone with them chatting about my experience and some of the science in the Zeo.

You’ll recall that the last straw for me was that the Zeo wasn’t registering periods of wakefulness that I knew were happening — 5 or 10 minutes at a time — so that undermined my faith it it. Shambroom said that, counter-intuitively, determining wake state is actually harder than telling the difference between light sleep, deep sleep, and REM — the brain waves (or whatever) just aren’t really differentiated enough from light sleep. So periods of wakefulness are a weak point in the system.

We talked for a while about the implications of that — and ultimately I came to this understanding: my relationship with sleep is a pretty emotional one, and often intensely frustrating. What I mean when I say that is that because I’ve had trouble sleeping my whole life — with both apnea and insomnia issues — and it’s such a hard problem to debug properly, combined with the fact that when I can’t sleep I’m always tired & cranky — that all adds up to a lot of emotional context when trying to figure out my sleep. And in particular, the parts when I’m awake and can’t get back to sleep are the most obviously frustrating, since I’m asleep during the other times.

And so when you take the fact that the Zeo fell down on tracking a scientifically not-that-interesting issue (short periods of wakefulness), but highly emotionally charged one (can’t sleep!), that adds up to a perception problem (at least) for Zeo. They’re working on it, though, and I’m encouraged that they’re really trying to get this better as they go.

I was really happy for them to reach out to me to understand my own situation, and was really happy with their followups after the call (they sent me some research that may help me understand some things better).

Anyway, I’m looking forward to the next improvement from them, and my overall experience so far has been pretty good.


11
Jan 10

Lots to write…

I’ve had lots of things I want to write about lately, but no time or mood to write. But hopefully over the next few weeks. Among other things I want to write about:

  • Zeo followups
  • Moving blog to wordpress.com? (would lose the widgets on the RHS though)
  • Christmas through a 4-year-old’s eyes and other thoughts on the nature of time and being in the moment
  • Thoughts on using Android on the Nexus One
  • Some reactions to location-based apps like Gowalla, 4square, etc.

And then a bunch of stuff I’m reading. Too Big To Fail is great, but also sorta too long to read. About 1/2way through. The new Lethem I’m really struggling to get through. A little too inside NYC.


21
Dec 09

How I Deal with Email

Deb sent me a note a few days ago wanting to know how I deal with all my mail each day — one of the things I’ve always been really good about is e-mail responsiveness. When I sent her something back, she noted it would be a good blog post, so here you go. :-)

  1. First & foremost, I treat my email as (probably my most important) work queue. (although that’s both work and professional.) I don’t really use it at all for information sources, etc.
  2. No bug mail of note goes into my e-mail. That’s not really a decision so much as a responsibilities thing. but i think the volume of bugmail is so brutal that it’s an e-mail destroyer. (So if I had to get a lot of it, I would segment into a different account.)
  3. I’m on basically zero mailing lists — have other ways of reading that stuff.
  4. I try really hard to get my inbox to less than 20 messages before i leave each day; and 10 before I go to bed. Happens most of the time. I’m sitting on 6 messages in my inbox now, for example. Staying on top of things is *way* easier than getting on top.
  5. Any message that I can respond to quickly, I do, and then throw it away. I do that a lot on my iPhone, as I walk between meetings, wait for my lunch appointment to show up, whatever.
  6. If something is in my box that’s going to take a while to get sorted out, I file it and move the task to my Things list.
  7. Also, if it’s going to take a few days to get back to someone, I generally send them a note to that effect — that I’ll get back to them. and sometimes, especially when I’m doing a favor for someone, I send a note that says “if you don’t hear from me by Tuesday, send me a note”
  8. I try really hard to respond to everyone — either the content of what they want, or the message that it’ll be a while — during the same day — don’t always get that done, but mostly. Generally, my inbox is a bunch of messages from “Today”, a handful from “Yesterday” and some that have actual dates on them. If I note the dated ones getting too long ago, I generally think about how to make traction on them. (There’s some core of ~3-4 messages that are on longer-running topics that sometimes I’m comfortable to just leave there since I know I’ll get to them by the weekend.

An observation I’ve had lately: I’m getting less mail than I used to. More is happening on twitter, IM, etc.

It’s that combo of stuff that I do. I now pretty much don’t file things away, either — I put them either into “FileToKeep” (which I keep for a long time) or (mostly) into “FileToTrash” (which I clean out so that I only have 3 months of past mail in it).

I think the critical things are: (1) treating it purely as a work queue (and getting off every other mailing, or separating to another account, like bugmail), (2) having a discipline about quickly giving *some* response, (3) moving long running tasks to a task list and (4) getting it very close to zero when you start, as I think it’s difficult to whittle down over time (I’ve seen a lot of inboxes with thousands of messages in them — don’t know how you can do anything with those.)

That’s what I do. You?


22
Nov 09

Rome

I’ve wanted to visit Rome for a long time — since high school when I learned about it in Mr. Thompson’s Latin class, really. But I’d never been — there aren’t a ton of reasons to get there for work, and I’d never been on holiday either.

But a couple of weeks ago, I got a chance to go for a few days of vacation there, prior to a visit to our Paris office and attending the Monaco Media Forum. Thanks to my mom being kind enough to visit, Kathy was able to go as well, so we got to spend a fantastic 4 days together exploring Rome.

I have a lot of different reactions to Rome — but the main one is that it feels like 4 or 5 different, distinct cities that all happen to be located in the same place. There’s Ancient Rome, of course, and Catholic Rome (and the Vatican) — and Renaissance Rome (including the home of the Medicis) and modern, International Rome. These are all related to each other, naturally (for example, the Popes underwrote much of the Renaissance work) — but just felt really distinct to me — a little more than I expected. (There are also some interesting monuments to Italian nationalism built earlier in the 20th century, celebrating people like Vittorio Emmanuel II, first king of a united Italy.)

In some parts of Rome, the various periods collide in interesting ways — the Pantheon, for example, has functioned more or less continuously since being built by Agrippa in the first century BC (and then rebuilt in the 2nd century AD) — it’s now a Catholic church, but also is where Vittorio Emmanuel is buried, not to mention Raphael — and is of course, despite being nearly 2,000 years old, the largest concrete dome in the world.

I found the Pantheon to be incredible — there’s something about the proportions of the building that make it feel incredibly stable — there’s a rightness to it that’s incredibly compelling. (I think the iconic status of the place plays into that, but it’s not just that.)

And the Roman Forum and the structures of the emperors on the Palatine hill were amazing, of course. There’s something about being able to walk through the forum, to walk through Domus Augustana (the villa that the Flavians built), and just try to imagine what it looked like, what it felt like, how life must have been. I’d always heard the aphorism: “Augustus found Rome a city of brick and left it a city of marble,” but not really internalized what that meant — as you walk around the Palatine & the Forum, you get a sense — many of the buildings have small holes in them — where the metal hooks had been that had previously held the marble facing for buildings (and that metal was eventually melted down to make ammunition, centuries later, naturally).

The permanence of the ancient buildings is astounding, and — especially taken with the incredible Colosseum, and the remnants of the aqueducts nearby — really hammers home the point that this civilization, for all its obvious faults, really knew what it was doing. Their level of building, planning, administration, and just general control of civic life was unprecedented, and incredible.

Of course, the next question you’re faced with is this: what the hell happened? We know, of course, with hindsight that what happened was invaders from the North, and the middle/dark ages, and the plague, and a shift of power to Constantinople in the East. But, really, it took a thousand years after the fall of Rome to start to approach the level of competence of the Romans again.

What a remarkable thing. I think most of us think of history as a more or less one direction proposition: progress. (We can debate for a while whether, you know, tending to virtual fish & farms is, strictly speaking, but you know what I mean.) And maybe the progress is of a technological sort, or maybe it’s geographic, moving from civilization to civilization.

But you never think the whole world (give or take) will take a gigantic, centuries-long, step backwards. We all read about it in school, of course, and understand it intellectually, but being there, seeing it and thinking about it just left me breathless.

Anyway. Fantastic trip; hope to get back to see more than just Rome, and spend more time in the city itself, too. Will hold onto my camera better next time, too.

I’ve put up a set of pictures of Rome, plus out the window from my hotel room in Monte Carlo, up on Flickr. (Taken with our smaller Lumix LX-3 camera, which is fantastic.)